Gorman v. Tassajara Dev. Corp.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 11/4/09 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOHN C. GORMAN et al., H031196 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CV011261) Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING TASSAJARA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., NO CHANGE IN THE JUDGMENT Defendants and Respondents. THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on October 6, 2009, be modified as follows: 1. On page 56, line 15, after the first sentencing ending with practitioner and before the second sentence starting with In Trope insert the following sentence: It is also settled that, if the Gorman firm had represented itself in litigation, it would not be able to recover for its own attorney fees. 1 There is no change in the judgment. Appellant s petition for rehearing is denied. Dated: ____________________________________ RUSHING, P.J. WE CONCUR: _________________________________ PREMO, J. _________________________________ ELIA, J. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.