In re Application for Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dan Ross as Next Friend on Behalf of Michael B. Ross
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the officially released date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the officially released date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ****************************************************** IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY DAN ROSS AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS (SC 17342) IN RE APPLICATION FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF PUBLIC DEFENDER AS NEXT FRIEND ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL B. ROSS (SC 17343) Sullivan, C. J., and Norcott, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Lavery, Foti and Dranginis, Js. Argued January 21 officially released January 25, 2005* Jon L. Schoenhorn, for the plaintiff in error (petitioner Dan Ross). Temmy Ann Pieszak, chief of habeas corpus services, with whom was Adele V. Patterson, assistant public defender, for the plaintiff in error (petitioner office of the chief public defender). Harry Weller, supervisory assistant state s attorney, with whom were Kevin T. Kane, state s attorney, and Michael O Hare, supervisory assistant state s attorney, and, on the brief, Robert J. Scheinblum, assistant state s attorney, and Jessica Probolus, special deputy assistant state s attorney, for defendant in error (respondent commissioner of correction). Edward J. Gavin filed a brief for the Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Association as amicus curiae. Opinion ZARELLA, J. The motions for stay of execution filed by the plaintiffs in error are dismissed as moot. A full opinion will follow in due course. In this opinion SULLIVAN, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE and FOTI, Js., concurred. * On January 25, 2005, this decision was released as a slip opinion.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
