HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY v. Dean, 15 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir. 1926)
Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- 15 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir. 1926)
October 15, 1926
15 F.2d 1013 (1926)
HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY
v.
Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio.
No. 4693.
October 15, 1926.
October 15, 1926
v.
Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First District of Ohio.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Norwood J. Utter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.
Haveth E. Mau, U. S. Atty., and Simon Ross, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error.
*1014 PER CURIAM.
Judgment of the District Court affirmed, upon the authority of Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; Fleischman v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624; United States v. Gordin (C. C. A. 6) 9 F.(2d) 394.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
