Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank et al, 214 F.2d 113 (9th Cir. 1954)
Annotate this CaseRehearing Denied July 15, 1954
S. P. Beecher, in pro. per.
C. D. Randall, Randall & Danskin & Lundin, Henry R. Newton, John J. Ripple, Spokane, Wash., Fred M. Crollard, Sr., Wenatchee, Wash., for appellees.
Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellees move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that Beecher has failed to take the proper steps necessary to perfect it. The motion is well made. The attorney for the Bank states he never received a copy of Beecher's statement of points on appeal and there is no affidavit sworn before a notary or otherwise in the record of a service by mail upon the Bank.
The statement of points reveals that Beecher is relying upon the contention that there are moneys in the registry of the court which are available for the purposes of redeeming the property. This contention has been rejected by this court. Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 9 Cir., 211 F.2d 158, certiorari denied, 347 U.S. 949, 74 S. Ct. 649, see also Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 9 Cir., 209 F.2d 20, 22, certiorari denied, 347 U.S. 949, 74 S. Ct. 649.
The motion to dismiss is ordered granted.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
