National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District, Respondent, 469 F.2d 698 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseOn application for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Leonard M. Wagman, Atty. (argued), Kenneth Pearlman, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Charles M. Henderson, Director, Region 19, NLRB, Seattle, Wash., Abraham Siegel, Director, Region 31, NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Eugene R. Nielson (argued), Seattle, Wash., Thomas W. Feeny, of Blake, Feeny & Mosman, Lewiston, Idaho, George Davies, Seattle, Wash., for respondent.
Before CHAMBERS, DUNIWAY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Enforcement of the order of the Board against the Lewiston District is denied for jurisdictional reasons.
Our reading of NLRB v. Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County, 402 U.S. 600, 91 S. Ct. 1746, 29 L. Ed. 2d 206 (1971), and our examination of the facts brings us to the conclusion that the respondent is entitled to the political subdivision exemption under Section 2(2), 29 U.S.C. § 152(2) of the act.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
