Jerry Dempsey Mcintyre, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sherman Hatcher, Robert Miller, Lonnie Hammergran, Frankiesue Del Papa, Defendants-appellees, 103 F.3d 139 (9th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseBefore: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Jerry McIntyre, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in McIntyre's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We vacate and remand pursuant to Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988), because the district court failed to advise McIntyre of the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. See Arreola v. Mangaong, 65 F.3d 801, 802 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam).
We affirm the district court's denial of McIntyre's motion for class certification. See C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987) (finding that non-attorney may not represent others than himself); Lerwill v. Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc., 582 F.2d 507, 512 (9th Cir. 1978) (stating that the named representative of a class action "must appear able to prosecute the action vigorously through qualified counsel").
We deem waived McIntyre's appeal from the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel because he raises the issue for the first time in his reply brief. See Eberle v. City of Anaheim, 901 F.2d 814, 817 (9th Cir. 1990).
Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal.
AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED in part.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.