United States of America, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Danny Gonzales Garza, Defendant-appellee, 43 F.3d 1480 (9th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseBefore POOLE and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge.*
ORDER
Having considered the Supplemental Statement of Reasons, we hold that the district court adequately explained the extent of its departure from the United States Sentencing Guidelines in sentencing defendant Garza. Because we have previously found the departure was authorized pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b) and U.S.S.G. Sec. 5K2.0, and because the extent of the departure was reasonable, see United States v. Martinez-Gonzalez, 962 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir. 1992), we hereby AFFIRM.
Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.