1996 Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals Case Law

Opinions 3001 - 3500 of 4104

Seattle Audubon Society; Washington Environmental Council;washington Native Plants Society; Save the West;the Sierra Club, a Non-profitcorporation, Plaintiffs,andnative Forest Council, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James R. Moseley, in His Official Capacity As Asst.secretary of Agriculture; James Lyons, in His Officialcapacity As Asst. Secretary of Agriculture for Naturalresources and Environment; United States Forest Service, Anagency of the United States; Bureau of Land Management, Anagency of the United States; Michael Espy, in His Officialcapacity As Secretary of Agriculture; Bruce Babbitt, in Hiscapacity As Secretary of the Interior, Defendants-appellees,andwashington Contract Loggers Assoc.; Burgess Logging Co.;lone Rock Timber Company, Inc.; Jackie Bryan Cox; Frereslumber Company, Inc.; Norman v. Persons; A. Troy Reinhart;gregory A. Miller; Northwest Forest Resource Council,defendants-intervenors.seattle Audubon Society; Washington Environmental Council;the Sierra Club, a Non-profit Corporation; Nativeforest Council, Plaintiffs,andsave the West; Forest Conservation Council, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. James R. Moseley, in His Official Capacity As Asst.secretary of Agriculture; James Lyons, in His Officialcapacity As Asst. Secretary of Agriculture for Naturalresources and Environment; United States Forest Service, Anagency of the United States; Bureau of Land Management,medford District, an Agency of the United States; Michaelespy, in His Official Capacity As Secretary of Agriculture;bruce Babbitt, in His Capacity As Secretary of the Interior,defendants-appellees,andwashington Contract Loggers Assoc.; Burgess Logging Co.;lone Rock Timber Company, Inc.; Jackie Bryan Cox; Frereslumber Company, Inc.; Norman v. Persons; A. Troy Reinhart;gregory A. Miller; Northwest Forest Resource Council,defendants-intervenors.seattle Audubon Society; Washington Environmental Council;save the West; the Sierra Club, a Non-profitcorporation; Native Forest Council,forest Conservation Council,plaintiffs-appellees, v. James R. Moseley, in His Official Capacity As Asst.secretary of Agriculture; Bruce Babbitt, in His Capacity Assecretary of the Interior; United States Forest Service, Anagency of the United States; Bureau of Land Management,medford District, an Agency of the United States; Michaelespy, in His Official Capacity As Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants,washington Contract Loggers Assoc.; Burgess Logging Co.;lone Rock Timber Company, Inc.; Jackie Bryan Cox; Frereslumber Company, Inc.; Norman v. Persons; A. Troy Reinhart;gregory A. Miller; Defendants-intervenors,andjames Lyons, in His Official Capacity As Asst. Secretary Ofagriculture for Natural Resources and Environment,defendant-appellee,northwest Forest Resource Council, Defendant-intervenor-appellant
Date: April 10, 1996
Citation: 80 F.3d 1401
Melissa Holdings, Inc., (erroneously Identified Asdevelopment Partners, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshiremasterpiece, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshire-canon, Inc.,formerly Known As 338 Rodeo Corporation), a Californiacorporation; and Liberty Service Corporation, a Californiacorporation, Plaintiffs, v. Jpl Properties, a Purported California General Partnership;lorraine Howell, an Individual; Arthur G.lawrence, an Individual; Dr. Karl H.sturckow, an Individual, Defendants,jpl Properties, a California General Partnership; Arthur G.lawrence; Lorraine Howell; and Karl H. Sturckow,cross-complainants-appellants, v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (formerly Known Asresolution Trust Corporation), As Receiver for Columbiasavings and Loan Association, 338 Rodeo Corporation,wilshire-canon, Inc., Cross-defendants,andscott v. Ogilvie and Thomas Harrison, Cross-defendants-appellees.melissa Holdings, Inc., (erroneously Identified Asdevelopment Partners, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshiremasterpiece, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshire-canon, Inc.,formerly Known As 338 Rodeo Corporation), a Californiacorporation; and Liberty Service Corporation, a Californiacorporation, Plaintiffs-cross-defendants-appellants, v. Jpl Properties, a Purported California General Partnership;lorraine Howell, an Individual; Arthur G. Lawrence, Anindividual; Dr. Karl H. Sturckow, an Individual,defendants-cross-complainants-appellees,melissa Holdings, Inc., (erroneously Identified Asdevelopment Partners, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshiremasterpiece, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshire-canon, Inc.,formerly Known As 338 Rodeo Corporation), a Californiacorporation; and Liberty Service Corporation, a Californiacorporation, Plaintiffs, v. Jpl Properties, a Purported California General Partnership;lorraine Howell, an Individual; Arthur G.lawrence, an Individual; Dr. Karl H.sturckow, an Individual, Defendants,jpl Properties, a California General Partnership; Arthur G.lawrence; Lorraine Howell; and Karl H. Sturckow,cross-complainants-appellants, v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (formerly Known Asresolution Trust Corporation), As Receiver for Columbiasavings and Loan Association, 338 Rodeo Corporation,wilshire-canon, Inc., Development Partners, Inc., and Scottv. Ogilvie, Cross-defendants-appellees.melissa Holdings, Inc., (erroneously Identified Asdevelopment Partners, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshiremasterpiece, Inc., Formerly Known As Wilshire-canon, Inc.,formerly Known As 338 Rodeo Corporation), a Californiacorporation; and Liberty Service Corporation, a Californiacorporation, Plaintiffs, v. Jpl Properties; a Purported California General Partnership;lorraine Howell, an Individual; Arthur G.lawrence, an Individual; Dr. Karl H.sturckow, an Individual, Defendants,arthur G. Lawrence, Cross-complainant, v. Jpl Properties, a California General Partnership; Lorrainehowell; Karl H. Sturckow, Cross-complainants-appellants, v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, (formerly Known Asresolution Trust Corporation), As Receiver for Columbiasavings and Loan Association, 338 Rodeo Corporation,wilshire-canon, Inc., Development Partners, Inc., and Scottv. Ogilvie, Cross-defendants-appellees
Date: March 14, 1996
Citation: 79 F.3d 1153

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.