Martin v. Noble County Board of Commissioners, No. 1:2018cv00349 - Document 12 (N.D. Ind. 2018)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER The Court GRANTS Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners' Motion for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal DE 8 and ORDERS Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners to FILE the Amended Notice of Removal on or befo re November 30, 2018. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1774, the Court further ORDERS Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners to FILE with the Clerk of Court, on or before December 7, 2018, a copy of allrecords and proceedings in the State court. B ecause the filing of the State court proceedings, including the State court order granting George Gerdes and Lisa Gerdes leave to intervene as Defendants, should result in the addition ofGeorge Gerdes and Lisa Gerdes as Defendants in this action, including in the case caption of the electronic docket, the Court DENIES without prejudice Defendant Noble County Board of Commissionerss' Motion to Amend Case Caption DE 9 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul R Cherry on 11/28/18. (kjp)

Download PDF
Martin v. Noble County Board of Commissioners Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION WILLIAM F. MARTIN, JR., Plaintiff, v. NOBLE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO.: 1:18-CV-349-TLS-PRC OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal [DE 8] and on Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners’ Motion to Amend Case Caption [DE 9], both filed on November 12, 2018. Plaintiff has not filed a response, and the time to do so has passed. Plaintiff William F. Martin, Jr. filed his Complaint in the Noble County, Indiana Superior Court on October 10, 2018. Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners was served with the Summons and Complaint on October 12, 2018. Defendant filed its Notice of Removal in this Court on October 30, 2018. Subsequently, Defendant learned that on October 26, 2018, the state court had granted George Gerdes and Lisa Gerdes leave to intervene in this action as Defendants. Accordingly, in the instant motion, Defendant asks for leave to file an Amended Notice of Removal to reflect the presence of Intervenor-Defendants George Gerdes and Lisa Gerdes. A defendant may freely amend the notice of removal for thirty days after receiving a copy of the state court complaint, or being served, whichever comes first. Buneta v. Fairmont City, Ill., No. 16-CV-794, 2016 WL 6246823, *2 (S.D. Ill. Oct. 26, 2016) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)). Because thirty days had not passed from the date Defendant was served with the Complaint (October Dockets.Justia.com 12, 2018) at the time Defendant sought leave to file the Amended Notice of Removal (November 12, 2018), no motion was necessary. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b). Notably, Plaintiff has not objected to the motion. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Notice of Removal [DE 8] and ORDERS Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners to FILE the Amended Notice of Removal on or before November 30, 2018. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1774, the Court further ORDERS Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners to FILE with the Clerk of Court, on or before December 7, 2018, a copy of all records and proceedings in the State court. Because the filing of the State court proceedings, including the State court order granting George Gerdes and Lisa Gerdes leave to intervene as Defendants, should result in the addition of George Gerdes and Lisa Gerdes as Defendants in this action, including in the case caption of the electronic docket, the Court DENIES without prejudice Defendant Noble County Board of Commissioners’ Motion to Amend Case Caption [DE 9]. So ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2018. s/ Paul R. Cherry MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL R. CHERRY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.