Harris v. City of Fort Wayne et al, No. 1:2022cv00237 - Document 23 (N.D. Ind. 2022)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff has until 11/18/2022 to file an Amended Complaint. The Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendants Epps and Kidd only 20 , has no effect and will be termed as a pending motion on the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Holly A Brady on 11/4/2022. (rmf)

Download PDF
Harris v. City of Fort Wayne et al Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION DESHAUN O. HARRIS Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FORT WAYNE, et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:22-CV-237-HAB-SLC ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER On November 1, 2022, counsel filed a Stipulated Notice of Dismissal seeking to dismiss Michael C. Epps and Donald Kidd from the Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 20). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) provides the terms upon which a plaintiff can voluntarily dismiss an action. The Seventh Circuit has indicated that Rule 41(a) should be used for the limited purpose of dismissing an entire action rather than for dismissal of individual parties or piecemeal claims. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) (“Although some courts have held otherwise, we’ve said that Rule 41(a) does not speak of dismissing one claim in a suit; it speaks of dismissing an action—which is to say, the whole case.”) (first quoting Berthold Types Ltd. v. Adobe Sys. Inc., 242 F.3d 772, 777 (7th Cir. 2001); then citing Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 588 (7th Cir. 2011)). According to the Seventh Circuit then, Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dropping individual parties or claims. See Taylor,787 F.3d at 858 n.9. (“The parties indicated that it's common practice in some district courts in this circuit to allow the voluntary dismissal of individual claims under Rule 41(a). If that is true, we remind judges to use Rule 15(a) instead.”). If Plaintiff desires, instead, to amend the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) Dockets.Justia.com to remove Defendants Epps and Kidd, leave is so granted. Plaintiff has until November 18, 2022, to file an Amended Complaint. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, the Stipulation of Dismissal as to Defendants Epps and Kidd only (ECF No. 20), has no effect and will be termed as a pending motion on the Court’s docket. SO ORDERED on November 4, 2022. s/ Holly A. Brady JUDGE HOLLY A. BRADY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.