Lohnes v. Brooks et al, No. 2:2019cv00097 - Document 41 (N.D. Ind. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 39 MOTION to Strike Defendants Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Court Order, filed by James Andrew Lohnes. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/17/19. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(kjp)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lohnes v. Brooks et al Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION JAMES ANDREW LOHNES, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO.: 2:19-CV-97-TLS-JPK OFFICER BROOKS, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER James Andrew Lohnes, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Response to Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Court Order [ECF No. 39] seeking to strike the Response [ECF No. 32] to his Motion to Enforce Court Order [ECF No. 24]. This motion [ECF No. 24] has already been ruled upon [ECF No. 35]. Lohnes asserts that counsel has deliberately misspelled the name of a corrections employee in order to harass him. There is no evidence that any misspelling was for the purpose of harassing him. Furthermore, Lohnes was not harmed by the error. The error, if any, had no bearing on this Court’s ruling. Lohnes also asks the Court to grant his Motion to Enforce Court Order. To the extent that Lohnes is seeking reconsideration of this Court’s December 4, 2019, Order denying his Motion to Enforce Court Order, the Court stands by its earlier ruling. Accordingly, the Motion [ECF No. 39] is DENIED. SO ORDERED on December 17, 2019 s/ Theresa L. Springmann CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
