Choe v. Singh et al, No. 2:2019cv00348 - Document 30 (N.D. Ind. 2019)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER The Court GRANTS the Parties' Agreed Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice ECF No. 29 . The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant State Farm be DISMISSED without prejudice. Because Plaintiff's claims against the other above-captioned Defendants were already dismissed ECF No. 26 and 27 , no claims remain and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/17/19. (nal)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Choe v. Singh et al Doc. 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION CHONG CHOE, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO.: 2:19-CV-348-TLS-JEM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; and LIBERTY MUTUAL COMMERCIAL MARKET, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on an “Agreed Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice” [ECF No. 29] submitted by Plaintiff and the sole remaining defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). The parties move the Court to dismiss the claims against State Farm without prejudice. While the parties do not cite any legal authority, the motion appears to be brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), which allows for an action to be dismissed by court order “on terms that the court considers proper.” Because the Parties agree to the dismissal, the Court considers the terms proper and GRANTS the Parties’ Agreed Stipulation of Dismissal Without Prejudice [ECF No. 29]. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant State Farm be DISMISSED without prejudice. Because Plaintiff’s claims against the other above-captioned Defendants were already dismissed [ECF No. 26, 27], no claims remain and the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED on December 17, 2019. Dockets.Justia.com s/ Theresa L. Springmann CHIEF JUDGE THERESA L. SPRINGMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
