Range v. Brubaker et al, No. 3:2007cv00480 - Document 464 (N.D. Ind. 2009)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: All remaining official capacity claims against Lynn Berndt are terminated. Office of the Procesuting Attorney is terminated as a party from this case. Signed by Judge William C Lee on 10/16/09. (sdf)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION STEPHEN RANGE, Plaintiff, v. DEVIN BRUBAKER, et al. Defendants ) ) ) ) ) Cause No. 3:07 CV 480 ) ) ) ) OPINION AND ORDER On March 26, 2008, Magistrate Judge Christopher A. Nuechterlein issued a Report and Recommendation wherein he recommended that the District Judge GRANT in part Defendants Lynn Berndt ( Berndt ) and the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney s motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Specifically, the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing all official capacity claims against Berndt and the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney as they were barred by the 11th Amendment. The Magistrate Judge left open the question as to whether Berndt could be sued in her individual capacity. On April 21, 2008, the undersigned adopted the Magistrate Judge s Report and Recommendation and Berndt in her official capacity and the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney were terminated parties to the case. On July 16, 2008, plaintiff Stephen Range, filed an amended complaint wherein he again named Berndt in her official capacity as well as the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney. Upon review of the Amended Complaint, it is clear that the reasons initially set out in the Magistrate Judge s March 26, 2008 Report and Recommendation adopted by the undersigned on April 21, 2008, remain valid legal reasons to dismiss the official capacity claims against Berndt and the Office of the Prosecuting Attroney. Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to show any remaining official capacity claims against Berndt termed on the docket. Further, the Clerk is HEREBY DIRECTED to terminate from the docket the Office of the Prosecuting Attorney as a party to this case. SO ORDERED. This 16th day of October, 2009 s/ William C. Lee United States District Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.