United States of America v. Wright et al, No. 3:2009cv00046 - Document 30 (N.D. Ind. 2009)
Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER denying 28 Motion Amend/Correct Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert L Miller, Jr on 10/29/09. (jld)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff vs. TYRUS B. WRIGHT, FIRST SOURCE BANK, and COASTAL VALLEY WATER COMPANY, Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CAUSE NO. 3:09-CV-46 RM OPINION and ORDER First Source Bank moved to amend the judgment in this case to obtain further recovery for expenses incurred in the maintenance of property sold through foreclosure proceedings. The United States responded to this motion, pointing out that this court entered final judgment in this matter in June 2009, and arguing that the Bank s carelessness in not anticipating these expenses in its stipulation with the Government is insufficient reason to amend the judgment. First Source Bank hasn t filed a reply, and the time to file such reply has lapsed. FED. R. CIV. P. 59(e) provides that a motion to alter or amend a judgment must be filed no later than 10 days after the entry of the judgment. The Bank s motion comes a few months after entry of judgment in this case, which is too late. FED R. CIV. P. 60(b) allows a motion to alter or amend judgment within one year for limited reasons, including excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, and fraud. It is an extraordinary remedy for exceptional circumstances, and neither ignorance nor carelessness on the part of a litigant or of his attorney provide grounds for relief under Rule 60. Ben Sager Chemicals Int l, Inc. v. E. Targaosz & Co., 560 F.2d 805, 809 (7th Cir. 1982). First Bank has provided no sufficient reason for why this court should amend the judgment in this case to the detriment of other parties, especially given that First Bank participated in the negotiations of and approved the form of order for the judgment. For these reasons, First Bank s motion to amend judgment [Doc. No. 28] is DENIED. SO ORDERED. ENTERED: October 29, 2009 /s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr. Chief Judge United States District Court
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
