Anderson v. Kinsley, No. 3:2023cv00776 - Document 16 (N.D. Ind. 2024)

Court Description: OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS Nathan Anderson until 3/18/2024, to file an amended complaint and CAUTIONS Nathan Anderson if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A without further notice because the current complaint does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Jon E DeGuilio on 2/14/2024. (mrm)

Download PDF

Anderson v. Kinsley Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION NATHAN ANDERSON, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-776-JD-JEM KINSLEY, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Nathan Anderson, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint. ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the merits of a prisoner complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. Anderson alleges that, on May 17, 2022, he received x-ray results showing that his ribs, wrist, and fingers were fractured. Prior to this, Dr. Kinsley examined him and squeezed and bent his wrist, causing pain. Dr. Kinsley also had Anderson squeeze his index finger to test his gripping strength, because Dr. Kinsley did not believe Anderson’s wrist was fractured. Dockets.Justia.com Under the Eighth Amendment, inmates are entitled to adequate medical care. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). To establish liability, a prisoner must satisfy both an objective and subjective component by showing: (1) his medical need was objectively serious; and (2) the defendant acted with deliberate indifference to that medical need. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994). A medical need is “serious” if it is one that a physician has diagnosed as mandating treatment, or one that is so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor’s attention. Greeno v. Daley, 414 F.3d 645, 653 (7th Cir. 2005). Deliberate indifference means that the defendant “acted in an intentional or criminally reckless manner, i.e., the defendant must have known that the plaintiff was at serious risk of being harmed and decided not to do anything to prevent that harm from occurring even though he could have easily done so.” Board v. Farnham, 394 F.3d 469, 478 (7th Cir. 2005). For a medical professional to be held liable for deliberate indifference to an inmate’s medical needs, he or she must make a decision that represents “such a substantial departure from accepted professional judgment, practice, or standards, as to demonstrate that the person responsible actually did not base the decision on such a judgment.” Jackson v. Kotter, 541 F.3d 688, 697 (7th Cir. 2008). Here, the complaint alleges that Dr. Kinsley’s examination of Anderson’s wrist prior to receiving x-ray results was excruciatingly painful because, as x-rays would later show, his wrist and fingers were fractured. It cannot be plausibly inferred from the facts alleged in the complaint that Dr. Kinsley’s brief but painful examination of Anderson’s 2 wrist and fingers amounted to deliberate indifference to Anderson’s serious medical needs. This complaint does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. If Anderson believes he can state a claim based on (and consistent with) the events described in this complaint, he may file an amended complaint because “[t]he usual standard in civil cases is to allow defective pleadings to be corrected, especially in early stages, at least where amendment would not be futile.” Abu-Shawish v. United States, 898 F.3d 726, 738 (7th Cir. 2018). To file an amended complaint, he needs to write this cause number on a Pro Se 14 (INND Rev. 2/20) Prisoner Complaint form which is available from his law library. He needs to write the word “Amended” on the first page above the title “Prisoner Complaint” and send it to the court after he properly completes the form. For these reasons, the court: (1) GRANTS Nathan Anderson until March 18, 2024, to file an amended complaint; and (2) CAUTIONS Nathan Anderson if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A without further notice because the current complaint does not state a claim for which relief can be granted. SO ORDERED on February 14, 2024 /s/JON E. DEGUILIO JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.