GLASCO v. KNIGHT et al, No. 1:2008cv01711 - Document 68 (S.D. Ind. 2010)
Court Description: ENTRY: The plaintiff's motion to present evidence 67 is denied, because final judgment was entered in the action on December 2, 2009, because the court ruled on the defendants' motion for summary judgment only after the plaintiff had responded to such motion, and because the present motion does not seek relief based on any of the grounds specified in Rule 60(b) **SEE ENTRY**. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/14/2010. (DWH)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GLASCO v. KNIGHT et al Doc. 68 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA CONZALOS GLASCO, Plaintiff, vs. CAPTAIN PRULHIERE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:08-cv-1711-WTL-DML ENTRY “Rule 60 regulates the procedures by which a party may obtain relief from a final judgment . . . . The rule attempts to strike a proper balance between the conflicting principles that litigation must be brought to an end and that justice should be done.” 11 Charles Alan Wright and Andrew D. Liepold, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2851 (4th ed. 2008). "A Rule 60(b) motion permits relief from judgment [only] when it is based on one of six specific grounds listed in the rule." Talano v. Northwestern Med. Faculty Found., 273 F.3d 757, 762 (7th Cir. 2001). A motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) permits a party to seek relief from judgment on the grounds of mistake, inadvertence, excusable neglect, newly discovered evidence, and fraud. American Federation of Grain Millers, Local 24 v. Cargill Inc., 15 F.3d 726, 728 (7th Cir. 1994). It also authorizes relief for "any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment." Rule 60(b), F.R.Civ.P. The plaintiff’s motion to present evidence (dkt 67) is denied, because final judgment was entered in the action on December 2, 2009, because the court ruled on the defendants’ motion for summary judgment only after the plaintiff had responded to such motion, and because the present motion does not seek relief based on any of the grounds specified in Rule 60(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: 01/14/2010 _______________________________ Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Dockets.Justia.com Distribution: Laura Lee Bowker laura.bowker@atg.in.gov Akia Haynes akia.haynes@atg.in.gov Conzalos Glasco 890756 Westville Control Unit 5501 South 1100 West Westville, Indiana 46391
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
