Wilson v. Gov. Glenn Youngkin et al, No. 3:2023cv00451 - Document 5 (E.D. Va. 2024)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. See Opinion for details. Signed by District Judge David J. Novak on 5/1/2024. Memorandum Opinion was mailed to the plaintiff. (sbea)

Download PDF
Wilson v. Gov. Glenn Youngkin et al Doc. 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 3:23cv451 (DJN) GOV. GLENN YOUNGKIN, et. al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Virginia inmate, submitted this action that was transferred to this Court by the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The pertinent statute provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [in forma pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). At the time that he filed this action, Plaintiff has at least three other actions or appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. • See Wilson v. Arthur, No. 3:23cv82 (DJN), 2023 WL 2506420, at *6 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2023); Wilson v. Burgess, No. 3:22cv662 (DJN), 2023 WL 2505863, at *5 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2023); Wilson v. Arthur, No. 3:22cv602 (DJN), 2023 WL 2507554, at *6 (E.D. Va. Mar. 14, 2023), ajf'd2023 WL 4839377 (4th Cir. July 28, 2023); Wilson v. U.S.P.S, No. 3:22cv689 (DJN), 2023 WL 1997069, *2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2023); Wilson v. Lindsey, No. 3:23cv83 (DJN), 2023 WL 1997070, at *2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 14, 2023), ajf'd 2023 WL 4839386 (4th Cir. July 28, 2023). Plaintiffs current complaint does not credibly suggest that he stands in imminent danger of serious physical harm. Dockets.Justia.com Accordingly, his request to proceed informa pauperis will be DENIED. The action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff remains free to submit a new complaint with the full $405 filing fee. The Court will process such a complaint as a new civil action. An appropriate Final Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion. Let the Clerk file a copy of the Memorandum Opinion electronically and send a copy to Plaintiff. Isl David J. Novak United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Dated: May 1, 2024 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.