Richard v. Kelsey et al, No. 3:2009cv05253 - Document 28 (W.D. Wash. 2009)
Court Description: MINUTE ORDER - Defendants are to file a response to Plaintiffs Motion 24 for Reconsideration of Order granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss 22 and Final Judgment 23 . The response is due by November 2, 2009.Court denies the request for Oral Argument.The Court will consider the motion November 6, 2009. s/Pat LeFrois as directed. (PL)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Richard v. Kelsey et al Doc. 28 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 TAMMIE C. RICHARD, Plaintiff, vs 10 CV09-5253FDB CECIL KELSEY, et al., 9 MINUTE ORDER 11 12 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 17 NOW, on this 19th Day of October, 2009, the Court directs the Clerk to enter the following Minute Order: 18 19 Defendants are to file a response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order granting 20 Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [22] and Final Judgment [23]. 21 The response is due by November 2, 2009. 22 Court denies the request for Oral Argument. 23 24 25 The Court will consider the motion November 6, 2009. . The foregoing Minute Order entered at the direction of the Honorable Franklin D. Burgess, United 26 27 28 States District Judge. . /s/ Pat LeFrois Pat LeFrois Courtroom Deputy Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
