Lee Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities, Inc. v. John Hamilton
Annotate this Case FOR PUBLICATION
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:
JANET A. McSHARAR STEVE CARTER
THOMAS E. SCHULTE Attorney General of Indiana
Harrison & Moberly, L.L.P.
Indianapolis, Indiana ELLEN H. MEILAENDER
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
LEE ALAN BRYANT HEALTH CARE ) FACILITIES, INC., ) ) Appellant-Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 61A04-0210-CV-516 ) JOHN HAMILTON, in his official capacity as ) Secretary of the FAMILY AND SOCIAL ) SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, FAMILY AND ) SOCIAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, ) DIVISION OF DISABILITY, AGING AND ) REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, and ROBERT ) HORNYAK, Acting Director RESIDENTIAL ) CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, ) ) Appellees-Defendants. )
APPEAL FROM THE PARKE CIRCUIT COURT
The Honorable Ronda R. Brown, Judge
Cause No. 61C01-0202-MI-51
August 12, 2003
OPINION ON REHEARING - FOR PUBLICATION
BROOK, Chief Judge
In its petition for rehearing, Lee Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities, Inc. ("Bryant Health Care"), contends that in our original opinion, we incorrectly assumed that the Division of Disability and Rehabilitative Services ("DDARS") is unable to fund all eligible applicants for the Residential Care Assistance Program ("RCAP"). See Lee Alan Bryant Health Care Facilities, Inc. v. Hamilton, 788 N.E.2d 495 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003). Bryant Health Care contends that DDARS designated no evidence that it would be unable to provide assistance to every eligible RCAP applicant. We grant rehearing for the limited purpose of addressing Bryant Health Care's contention.
In support of its motion for summary judgment, DDARS designated undisputed evidence of a projected budgetary shortfall for RCAP. As we explained in our original opinion, absent a statutory mandate to fund all eligible RCAP applicants, DDARS is under no legal obligation to do so. Id. at 501; cf. Center Township v. Coe, 572 N.E.2d 1350 (Ind. Ct. App. 1991). Although Indiana Code 12-10-6 prohibits DDARS from creating a waiting list of RCAP applicants, it does not prohibit DDARS from disbursing its RCAP appropriation at its discretion. We therefore leave the disbursement of RCAP funds to DDARS's discretion. See State Bd. of Fin. v. Marion County Superior Ct., 272 Ind. 47, 49, 396 N.E.2d 340, 343 (1979) ("Even though courts do have the authority to compel public officials to act where there is a clear legal duty to perform, they cannot compel exercise of a discretionary act in any particular manner.").
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.