Moore v. State
Annotate this CaseAfter a jury trial, Defendant was found guilty of felony murder and murder. Defendant was sentenced to sixty-five years for the felony murder and life without parole for the murder. Defendant appealed, asserting that there was insufficient evidence for his convictions and that the incredible dubiosity rule should be applied because no reasonable jury could have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt given the inconsistent testimony among three of the State’s primary witnesses. The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant’s convictions and sentence, holding that the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt for both murders.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.