Martin v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Martin v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2009-Ohio-5321.] Court of Claims of Ohio The Ohio Judicial Center 65 South Front Street, Third Floor Columbus, OH 43215 614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263 www.cco.state.oh.us ROBERT MARTIN Plaintiff v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION Defendant Case No. 2008-05265 Judge J. Craig Wright Magistrate Steven A. Larson JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} On July 28, 2009, the magistrate issued a decision recommending that plaintiff s complaint be dismissed, in part, and that judgment be rendered in favor of defendant on plaintiff s remaining claims. {¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: A party may file written objections to a magistrate s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ.R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i). No objections were filed. {¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Plaintiff s claims regarding his exempt funds, his going home pay, and his indigent status are DISMISSED. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant on plaintiff s claim regarding the interest earned on his inmate account. Case No. 2008-05265 -2- JUDGMENT ENTRY Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. _____________________________________ J. CRAIG WRIGHT Judge cc: Brian M. Kneafsey Jr. Assistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130 Magistrate Steven A. Larson MR/cmd Filed September 11, 2009 To S.C. reporter October 6, 2009 Robert Martin, #138-186 2001 East Central Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43608
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
