Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2009-Ohio-3451.] NAGEL, APPELLEE, v. HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK, APPELLANT. [Cite as Nagel v. Huntington Natl. Bank, 122 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2009-Ohio-3451.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently accepted. (No. 2008-2501 Submitted July 14, 2009 Decided July 21, 2009.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 90662, 179 Ohio App.3d 126, 2008-Ohio-5741. __________________ {ΒΆ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O CONNOR, O DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. __________________ Dworken & Bernstein Co., L.P.A., and Patrick J. Perotti; and Brian G. Ruschel, for appellee. Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, L.L.P., Jennifer T. Mills, and L. Bradfield Hughes, for appellant. ______________________
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
