State v. Irvin

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Irvin, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3587.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published. SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-3587 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. IRVIN, APPELLANT. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Irvin, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3587.] Court of appeals’ judgment vacated on the authority of State v. Brooks and cause remanded. (Nos. 2020-1294 and 2020-1420 Submitted October 4, 2022 Decided October 12, 2022.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 28495, 2020-Ohio-4847. _________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated on the authority of State v. Brooks, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-2478, __ N.E.3d __, and the cause is remanded to that court for it to conduct a harmless-error analysis. O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART, and BRUNNER, JJ., concur. _________________ SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Heather N. Ketter, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant, Lance Irvin. _________________ 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.