Scott E. Stafne, Appellant V. Seattle School District No. 1., Et Al., Respondents

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON JOY LYNN ANDERSON, MARISSA ESSAD, STACEY GUZEK, RICKIE MALONE, and JOAN SIAS, ) ) ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ) KING COUNTY, STATE OF ) WASHINGTON, BOARD OF ) DIRECTORS OF SEATTLE SCHOOL ) DISTRICT NO. 1, and MARIA ) GOODLOE-JOHNSON, Superintendent ) and Secretary of the Board, ) ) Respondents, ) SCOTT E. STAFNE, ) ) Appellant. ) No. 66140-0-I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION ) FILED: November 14, 2011 Grosse, J. Under RAP 3.1 only an aggrieved party may seek review by the appellate court. An aggrieved party is one whose proprietary, pecuniary, or personal rights are substantially affected. Here, the superior court dismissed the administrative appeal of several petitioners who were represented by Scott Stafne. They did not appeal, but Stafne did. Because Stafne was not a party in the action below and his rights are not affected, he is not aggrieved and thus has no standing to seek review. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. WE CONCUR: No. 66140-0-I / 2 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.